From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parham v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Sep 18, 2013
No. 63805 (Nev. Sep. 18, 2013)

Opinion

No. 63805

2013-09-18

JOHNNIE LEE PARHAM, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA; AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondents.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is a proper person petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner challenges the judgment of conviction. We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in this matter. Challenges to the judgment of conviction must be raised in a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus and filed in the district court in the first instance. See NRS 34.724(2)(b); NRS 34.738U). Accordingly, we

We express no opinion as to whether petitioner could meet the procedural requirements of NRS chapter 34.

ORDER the petition DENIED.

______________________, J.

Gibbons
______________________, J.
Douglas
______________________, J.
Saitta
cc: Johnnie Lee Parham

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Parham v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Sep 18, 2013
No. 63805 (Nev. Sep. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Parham v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHNNIE LEE PARHAM, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA; AND ATTORNEY…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Sep 18, 2013

Citations

No. 63805 (Nev. Sep. 18, 2013)