From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parekh v. Avis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 24, 2000
271 A.D.2d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

April 24, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, J.), entered May 6, 1999, which, upon the denial of their motion pursuant to CPLR 4401 for judgment in their favor as a matter of law, and upon a jury verdict in favor, of the defendant, dismissed the complaint.

Santucci, J. P., Altman, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The trial court properly denied the plaintiffs' motion for a directed verdict on the issue of whether the injured plaintiff had suffered a serious injury, "given the conflicting medical evidence as to whether there was a causal connection between the accident and plaintiffs alleged permanent [injuries]" ( Rosabella v. Fanelli, 225 A.D.2d 1007, 1008; see, Szczerbiak v. Pilat, 90 N.Y.2d 553, 556).

Additionally. the verdict in favor of the defendant was not against the weight of the evidence ( see, Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, 45 N.Y.2d 493, 499; Nicastro v. Park 113 A.D.2d 129).


Summaries of

Parekh v. Avis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 24, 2000
271 A.D.2d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Parekh v. Avis

Case Details

Full title:GEETA P. PAREKH et al., Appellants, v. JOHN AVIS, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 24, 2000

Citations

271 A.D.2d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
707 N.Y.S.2d 850

Citing Cases

Ocasio v. Zorbas

Here, while several physicians testified that the plaintiff sustained a herniated disc as a result of the…