From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paradise Products Corp. v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

United States District Court, N.D. California
May 20, 2003
Case No. C 02-4175 EMC (N.D. Cal. May. 20, 2003)

Opinion

Case No. C 02-4175 EMC.

May 20, 2003.

James D. Boughey, Michelle T. Luke, Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman Dicker LLP, Attorneys for Plaintiff Paradise Products Corp.

Amy Yaros, Scopelitis Garvin Light Hanson, Attorneys for Defendants Union Pacific Railroad Company and CSX.

Laura L. Chapman, Nixon Peabody LLP, Attorneys for Defendant Signature Fruit Company, LLC.


STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER THEREON


IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action, including the complaint and cross-complaint, be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.


Summaries of

Paradise Products Corp. v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

United States District Court, N.D. California
May 20, 2003
Case No. C 02-4175 EMC (N.D. Cal. May. 20, 2003)
Case details for

Paradise Products Corp. v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Case Details

Full title:PARADISE PRODUCTS CORP., Plaintiff, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, et…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: May 20, 2003

Citations

Case No. C 02-4175 EMC (N.D. Cal. May. 20, 2003)