From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Papenhauser v. Barnes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 9, 2013
3:12-cv-00084-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Apr. 9, 2013)

Opinion

3:12-cv-00084-LRH-VPC

04-09-2013

SCOTT PAPENHAUSER, Plaintiff, v. BARNES, Defendant.


ORDER

Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke (#6) entered on March 19, 2013, recommending dismissing this action without prejudice. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed. The action was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)B and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.

Refers to court's docket number.

The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#6) entered on March 19, 2013, should be adopted and accepted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#6) entered on March 19, 2013, is adopted and accepted, and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

LARRY R. HICKS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Papenhauser v. Barnes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 9, 2013
3:12-cv-00084-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Apr. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Papenhauser v. Barnes

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT PAPENHAUSER, Plaintiff, v. BARNES, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 9, 2013

Citations

3:12-cv-00084-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Apr. 9, 2013)