From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pantoja v. Enciso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 6, 2020
18 CIVIL 11842 (PAE)(GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 6, 2020)

Opinion

18 CIVIL 11842 (PAE)(GWG)

01-06-2020

RAPHAEL M. PANTOJA, RACHEL M. PANTOJA, and RAFAEL M. PANTOJA, Plaintiffs, v. JAVIER ENCISO & HERMAN QUAY, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated January 6, 2020, defendants' motion to dismiss, or, in the alternative, for summary judgment is granted; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

January 6, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Pantoja v. Enciso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 6, 2020
18 CIVIL 11842 (PAE)(GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 6, 2020)
Case details for

Pantoja v. Enciso

Case Details

Full title:RAPHAEL M. PANTOJA, RACHEL M. PANTOJA, and RAFAEL M. PANTOJA, Plaintiffs…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jan 6, 2020

Citations

18 CIVIL 11842 (PAE)(GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 6, 2020)