Opinion
Civ. 20-2043 (PAM/KMM)
06-30-2021
Jay Charles Panning, Plaintiff, v. County to State, Defendant.
ORDER
PAUL A. MAGNUSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge Kate Menendez dated June 10, 2021. (Docket No. 10.) The R&R recommends dismissing the Complaint for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff did not file any objections to the R&R, and the time to do so has passed. D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).
This Court must review de novo any portion of an R&R to which specific objections are made, but in the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R only for clear error. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b); see also Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (noting that district court need only review un-objected-to R&R for clear error). The Court has reviewed the R&R and finds no error, clear or otherwise, in the Magistrate Judge's reasoning.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The R&R (Docket No. 10) is ADOPTED; and
2. The Complaint (Docket No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.