Submitted December 4, 1978
Decided January 9, 1979
Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see, e.g., Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 N.Y. 284, 297-298 [CARDOZO, Ch. J.]; Matter of Brooklyn Hosp. v Lennon, 45 N.Y.2d 820).
Full title:JAMES PANICO, as a Professional Fire Fighter and Member of the Fairview…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jan 9, 1979
"In view of the dismissal thus mandated, this court, of course, has not reached the merits. It therefore goes…
People v. DercoleIn view of the dismissal thus mandated, this court, of course, has not reached the merits. It therefore goes…