From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Panella v. Weil-McLain Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jun 28, 1946
329 Ill. App. 240 (Ill. App. Ct. 1946)

Opinion

Gen. No. 43,282. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed June 28, 1946 Rehearing denied July 11, 1946 Released for publication July 13, 1946

AUTOMOBILES AND MOTOR VEHICLES, § 118when defendants' contention that there was no proof of their negligence was without merit. In action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when struck by defendants' truck after alighting from street car and while crossing street, where defendants contended that there was no proof as to their negligence, and it appeared that driver of truck testified that he was familiar with intersection, that after making right-hand turn onto street in question, he proceeded eastward at accelerated speed which was increased until time of accident, that he did not sound his horn at any time and that he knew that people alighted from street cars at that point and crossed street there, held that such contention was without merit.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. C.M. PLATT, Judge, presiding.

Judgment affirmed. Heard in the second division, first district, this court at the December term, 1944.

James A. Dooley, for appellant;

Arthur A. Wolf, Marion J. Hannigan and Leo S. Karlin, for appellee;

Leo S. Karlin, of counsel.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed June 28, 1946; rehearing denied July 11, 1946; released for publication July 13, 1946.


Summaries of

Panella v. Weil-McLain Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jun 28, 1946
329 Ill. App. 240 (Ill. App. Ct. 1946)
Case details for

Panella v. Weil-McLain Co.

Case Details

Full title:Margaret Panella, Appellee, v. Weil-McLain Company and Phillip Domke…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Jun 28, 1946

Citations

329 Ill. App. 240 (Ill. App. Ct. 1946)
67 N.E.2d 600

Citing Cases

Skaff v. Dodd

A cross-walk whether marked or unmarked, is an extension of the sidewalk lines over streets at street…

Roadruck v. Schultz

In reviewing the action of the court of which complaint is made we do not weigh the evidence, — we can look…