From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Panek Appeal

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Dec 15, 1980
423 A.2d 472 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1980)

Opinion

Argued November 20, 1980

December 15, 1980.

Eminent domain — Relocation damages — Eminent Domain Code, Act of June 22, 1964, P.L. 84 — Loss of patronage and business.

1. A condemnee forced to relocate his business is not entitled to relocation damages under the Eminent Domain Code, Act of June 22, 1964, P.L. 84, although patrons may have been lost when there has shown to be no loss of patronage or of business following the relocation. [329]

Argued November 20, 1980, before Judges WILKINSON, JR., MacPHAIL and WILLIAMS, JR., sitting as a panel of three.

Appeal, No. 2319 C.D. 1979, from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County in case of: Condemnation by Redevelopment Authority of the City of McKeesport, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, for Urban Redevelopment Purposes of certain properties in the Downtown Urban Renewal Project, Pa. R.-124, in the City of McKeesport, Pennsylvania, Being the Property of Amelia Malloy Hyatt, Bob J. White, a/k/a Robert J. White, Jane Madeline White, John Leo Malloy, II, and Equi-Bank, N.A., Trustee For Certain Unascertained Persons, Julian W. Panek and Mary Panek, t/d/b/a Lawrence, The Florists v. Redevelopment Authority of the City of McKeesport, No. 2892 April Term, 1973.

Declaration of taking in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County. Petition for relocation damages filed. Viewers appointed. Damages denied. Condemnees appealed. Compulsory non-suit entered. Motion to set aside non-suit filed and denied. SCHEIB, J. Condemnees appealed to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Held: Affirmed. Application for reargument filed and denied.

Martin F. P. Vinci, III, with him John M. Tighe, Tarasi Tighe, for appellants.

Clifford A. Johns, Jr., with him Thomas J. Dempsey, for appellee.


Julian W. Panek and Mary Panek (Appellants) operated a florist business in a leased premises located at 417 Ringgold Street in McKeesport for about seven years. In 1973, the Redevelopment Authority of the City of McKeesport (Authority) condemned that promises; as a consequence Appellants moved their business in May of 1973 to 519 Walnut Street, McKeesport. Appellants then sought relocation damages from the Authority pursuant to the provisions of Section 601A of the Eminent Domain Code, Act of June 22, 1964, P.L. 84, Special Sess., added by Section 8 of the Act of December 29, 1971, P.L. 640, 26 P. S. § 1-601A. A Board of View was appointed which awarded no damages to Appellants. On appeal to the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas, a compulsory non-suit was entered against Appellants and judgment entered thereon. Appellants' motion to set aside the compulsory non-suit was denied. This appeal followed.

Subsection (b)(3) of Section 601A reads in pertinent part as follows:

In the case of a business, payment shall be made under this subsection only if the business (i) cannot be relocated without a substantial loss of its existing patronage, and (ii) is not a part of a commercial enterprise having at least one other establishment not being acquired by the acquiring agency, which is engaged in the same or similar business. (Emphasis added.)

Evidence at the trial indicated that for the years prior to 1973 Appellants' business had a net loss. In 1973 it had a net profit of $389.97 and in 1974 a net profit of nearly $4,000. Notwithstanding the improvement in the profitability of their business, Appellants urge that they are entitled to damages because their exposure to potential customers is much less in their new location. They attribute their new found success to more advertising, better promotion and generally greater activity in the solicitation of customers.

As the learned trial judge noted in his opinion denying Appellants' motion to set aside the compulsory non-suit, "It is obvious from the record that the Paneks suffered no loss of patronage despite the fact that the business sustained a loss of patrons. It is lost business and not lost patrons that controls the Paneks' right to obtain business dislocation expenses."

In In Re: Condemnation by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation v. Brennan, 30 Pa. Commw. 58, 372 A.2d 1240 (1977), under almost identical factual conditions, this Court affirmed the entry of a compulsory non-suit holding that the appellants there confused loss of patronage with loss of patrons. The principles of law set forth in Brennan are fully applicable here and need not be reiterated.

Order affirmed.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 15th day of December, 1980, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County entered October 19, 1979 to No. 2892 April Term, 1973 is affirmed.


Summaries of

Panek Appeal

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Dec 15, 1980
423 A.2d 472 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1980)
Case details for

Panek Appeal

Case Details

Full title:Bob J. White et al., Julian W. Panek and Mary Panek, t/d/b/a Lawrence, The…

Court:Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 15, 1980

Citations

423 A.2d 472 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1980)
423 A.2d 472

Citing Cases

White v. Redev. A., City of McKeesport

Motion to set aside nonsuit filed and denied. Condemnees appealed to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.…