From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Panduit Corp. v. ADC Telecommunications, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Apr 17, 2014
562 F. App'x 973 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

Opinion

2013-1501 2013-1502

04-17-2014

PANDUIT CORPORATION, Appellant, v. ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., Cross-Appellant.

JESSE O. COLLIER, Oliff & Berridge, PLC, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were JAMES A. OLIFF and JOHN W. O'MEARA. PHILIP P. CASPERS, Carlson Caspers Vandenburgh Lindquist & Schuman, P.A., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for cross-appellant. With him on the brief were TIMOTHY A. LINDQUIST, SAMUEL A. HAMER and JOSEPH W. WINKELS.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade-mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination No. 95/000,411.

JUDGMENT

JESSE O. COLLIER, Oliff & Berridge, PLC, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were JAMES A. OLIFF and JOHN W. O'MEARA.

PHILIP P. CASPERS, Carlson Caspers Vandenburgh Lindquist & Schuman, P.A., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for cross-appellant. With him on the brief were TIMOTHY A. LINDQUIST, SAMUEL A. HAMER and JOSEPH W. WINKELS. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, PROST, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

__________

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Panduit Corp. v. ADC Telecommunications, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Apr 17, 2014
562 F. App'x 973 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Panduit Corp. v. ADC Telecommunications, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PANDUIT CORPORATION, Appellant, v. ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Apr 17, 2014

Citations

562 F. App'x 973 (Fed. Cir. 2014)