From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pando v. Santa Clara Valley Health & Hosp. Sys.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 5, 2024
23-cv-06592-JST (N.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-06592-JST

02-05-2024

HENRY PANDO, Plaintiff, v. SANTA CLARA VALLEY HEALTH AND HOSPITAL SYSTEM, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

JON S. TIGAR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On or about December 22, 2023, Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Court. ECF No. 1. The Court opened an action pursuant to this filing and, that same day, sent Plaintiff a notice that the action was deficient because he had not paid the filing fee or filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 2. The Court sent Plaintiff a blank in forma pauperis application form. Id. The deadline has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed an in forma pauperis application. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED for failure to either pay the filing fee or file a complete in forma pauperis application. The dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a motion to reopen the action. Any motion to reopen must be accompanied by either the filing fee or a complete in forma pauperis application. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff, terminate all pending motions as moot, and close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pando v. Santa Clara Valley Health & Hosp. Sys.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 5, 2024
23-cv-06592-JST (N.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2024)
Case details for

Pando v. Santa Clara Valley Health & Hosp. Sys.

Case Details

Full title:HENRY PANDO, Plaintiff, v. SANTA CLARA VALLEY HEALTH AND HOSPITAL SYSTEM…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 5, 2024

Citations

23-cv-06592-JST (N.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2024)