From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pamela Clayton-Garcia v. Moskin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 7, 1998
256 A.D.2d 299 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 7, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.)


Ordered that the order is modified, on the facts, by adding a provision thereto conditioning the granting of the plaintiff's motion on the payment of $1,500 by the plaintiff's attorneys to the attorneys for the defendants; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendants appeal the grant of the plaintiff's motion to restore this case to the trial calendar after it was dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404. However, because the plaintiff adequately demonstrated a meritorious cause of action, a reasonable excuse for her delay, the absence of an intent to abandon the matter, and a lack of prejudice to the defendants, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting such relief ( see, Robinson v. New York City Tr. Auth., 203 A.D.2d 351; Roberson v. City of New York, 195 A.D.2d 597; Hammer v. Hochberg, 128 A.D.2d 834; Friedberg v. Bay Ridge Orthopedic Assocs., 122 A.D.2d 194).

However, we have imposed costs of $1,500 upon the plaintiff's attorneys for their neglect in this matter as a condition to opening up the default.

Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pamela Clayton-Garcia v. Moskin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 7, 1998
256 A.D.2d 299 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Pamela Clayton-Garcia v. Moskin

Case Details

Full title:PAMELA CLAYTON-GARCIA, Respondent, v. JEFFREY MOSKIN et al., Appellants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 7, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 299 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
682 N.Y.S.2d 614

Citing Cases

Nisselson v. Hercules Construction Corp.

ORDERED that Alan Nisselson, the Trustee in Bankruptcy of D.S.R. Asbestos Removal Co., Inc., is awarded one…

Friedman v. Friedman

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion, with costs, the motion is…