Palomino v. State

Full title: ALEX MICHAEL PALOMINO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: May 1, 2020

293 So. 3d 1130 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 5D19-2463

05-01-2020

Alex Michael PALOMINO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Allison A. Havens, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Allison A. Havens, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm this appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). However, we remand to allow the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error in the order on fines and costs, erroneously reflecting a total of $2,141.50 in costs when the correct figure is actually $1,791.50. See Skinner v. State, 155 So. 3d 497 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015). AFFIRMED and REMANDED for correction of scrivener's error.

ORFINGER, WALLIS and TRAVER, JJ., concur.