From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palmquist et al. v. Armour Fert. Works

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Jan 6, 1927
111 So. 255 (Fla. 1927)

Opinion

Decision Filed January 6, 1927.

R. B. Moseley, for Plaintiffs in Error;

Evans Mershon, for Defendant in Error.

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Dade County; A. J. Rose, Judge.


This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

ELLIS, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, TERRELL, STRUM, BROWN AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.


Summaries of

Palmquist et al. v. Armour Fert. Works

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Jan 6, 1927
111 So. 255 (Fla. 1927)
Case details for

Palmquist et al. v. Armour Fert. Works

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTINE V. PALMQUIST AND E. V. PALMQUIST, Plaintiffs in Error, v. ARMOUR…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc

Date published: Jan 6, 1927

Citations

111 So. 255 (Fla. 1927)
111 So. 255