From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palmere v. Computerland

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 24, 1993
626 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-3440.

November 24, 1993.

Appeal from the Unemployment Appeals Commission.

Peter M. Palmere, pro se.

William T. Moore, Tallahassee, for appellee Florida Unemployment Appeals Com'n.


The order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission is reversed. In rejecting the appeals referee's holding that appellant was qualified for unemployment compensation benefits, the commission reweighed the evidence and included additional facts to justify its decision contrary to that of the referee. This is not permitted. See Forkey Kirsch, P.A. v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 407 So.2d 319 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); David Clark and Assocs. v. Kennedy, 390 So.2d 149 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). The referee's decision was based on competent substantial evidence. The commission's rejection of it was error.

Reversed and remanded for reinstatement of the referee's order.

HERSEY, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Palmere v. Computerland

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 24, 1993
626 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Palmere v. Computerland

Case Details

Full title:PETER M. PALMERE, APPELLANT, v. COMPUTERLAND AND FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 24, 1993

Citations

626 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Wall v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n

The UAC may not "reweigh the evidence and include additional facts to justify its decision contrary to the…

Salazar v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n

We reverse the UAC's decision denying benefits and remand with direction to reinstate the award made by the…