From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palmer v. Woodruff

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Apr 4, 1916
30 Cal.App. 251 (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)

Opinion

Civ. No. 1533.

April 4, 1916.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. Peter J. Shields, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Welsh Henry, for Appellant.

White, Miller, Needham Harber, for Respondents.


Notice of appeal from the judgment in the above-entitled cause was served and filed by defendant on July 20, 1915. On July 23, 1915, undertaking on appeal was filed. September 16, 1915, bill of exceptions was duly settled, and on December 13, 1915, motion for new trial was denied. Appellant has made no request of the clerk of the superior court to certify to a correct or any transcript of the record, and no further proceedings have been had toward prosecuting the appeal.

More than forty days having elapsed since the appeal was perfected and no transcript having been filed or extension of time given within which to file such transcript, on motion of respondents the appeal from the judgment is dismissed.


Summaries of

Palmer v. Woodruff

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Apr 4, 1916
30 Cal.App. 251 (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
Case details for

Palmer v. Woodruff

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE T. PALMER et al., Respondents, v. S. A. WOODRUFF, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Third District

Date published: Apr 4, 1916

Citations

30 Cal.App. 251 (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
157 P. 1137