From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palmer v. S.F. Jail Sheriff

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 22, 2024
No. 24-CV-00656-HSG (N.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2024)

Opinion

24-CV-00656-HSG

04-22-2024

JAMES DION PALMER, Petitioner, v. SAN FRANCISCO JAIL SHERIFF, Respondent.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On or about February 6, 2024, Petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Dkt. No. 1. That same day, the Court informed Petitioner that the action was deficient because Petitioner neither paid the filing fee nor filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. No. 2. The Court informed Petitioner that he should correct this deficiency by March 7, 2024, or the action would be dismissed. Id. The Court sent Petitioner a blank in forma pauperis application form. Id. The deadline has passed, and Petitioner has not filed an in forma pauperis application, or paid the filing fee, or otherwise communicated with the Court. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED for failure to either pay the filing fee or file a complete in forma pauperis application. The dismissal is without prejudice to Petitioner filing a motion to reopen the action. Any motion to reopen must be accompanied by either the filing fee or a complete in forma pauperis application. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Respondent and against Petitioner, and close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Palmer v. S.F. Jail Sheriff

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 22, 2024
No. 24-CV-00656-HSG (N.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Palmer v. S.F. Jail Sheriff

Case Details

Full title:JAMES DION PALMER, Petitioner, v. SAN FRANCISCO JAIL SHERIFF, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Apr 22, 2024

Citations

No. 24-CV-00656-HSG (N.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2024)