From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palmer v. Burke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 8, 2013
Case No. 1:12cv912 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 8, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:12cv912

01-08-2013

Atropin Palmer, Plaintiff, v. Officer Burke, et al., Defendant.


Judge Michael R. Barrett


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on December 13, 2012 (Doc. 4).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981. No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4) have been filed.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Plaintiff's claims against defendants Oppy and Wamsley are DISMISSED on the ground that they fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S. C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

Michael R. Barrett

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Palmer v. Burke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 8, 2013
Case No. 1:12cv912 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Palmer v. Burke

Case Details

Full title:Atropin Palmer, Plaintiff, v. Officer Burke, et al., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 8, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:12cv912 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 8, 2013)