Opinion
No. 81853-COA
03-30-2021
Albert PAIGE, III, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.
Albert Paige, III Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney
Albert Paige, III
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE
In his motion, Paige claimed he was entitled to additional presentence credits. Paige's claim fell outside the narrow scope of claims permissible in a motion to modify or correct an illegal sentence. See Edwards v. State , 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). Therefore, without considering the merits of the claim raised in the motion, we conclude the district court did not err by denying the motion. Further, we decline to consider arguments Paige raises for the first time in his informal brief on appeal. See Rimer v. State , 131 Nev. 307, 328 n.3, 351 P.3d 697, 713 n.3 (2015). Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.