From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paige v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 7, 2011
Case No. CV 11-03474 AHM (JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV 11-03474 AHM (JEMx)

10-07-2011

TANYA PAIGE, Plaintiff, v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, and DOE 1 through DOE 10 inclusive, Defendants,

THE BICKEL LAW FIRM, INC. Brian J. Bickel, State Bar No. 205646 Amanda L. Gray, State Bar No. 244644 Brian K. Cline State Bar No. 246747 Attorneys for Plaintiff TANYA PAIGE


THE BICKEL LAW FIRM, INC.

Brian J. Bickel, State Bar No. 205646

Amanda L. Gray, State Bar No. 244644

Brian K. Cline State Bar No. 246747

Attorneys for Plaintiff TANYA PAIGE

[Action Commenced: April 22, 2011]

ORDER DISMISSING THE ACTION

Hon. A. Howard Matz

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING and pursuant to the parties' stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED that the instant action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Honorable A. Howard Matz


Summaries of

Paige v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 7, 2011
Case No. CV 11-03474 AHM (JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Paige v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC

Case Details

Full title:TANYA PAIGE, Plaintiff, v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, and DOE 1 through DOE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 7, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV 11-03474 AHM (JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)