From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paige v. McDonough

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Apr 22, 2008
Case No.: 3:06cv389/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Apr. 22, 2008)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:06cv389/MCR/EMT.

April 22, 2008


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated September 26, 2007. The parties have been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 7) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Paige v. McDonough

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Apr 22, 2008
Case No.: 3:06cv389/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Apr. 22, 2008)
Case details for

Paige v. McDonough

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM H. PAIGE, Petitioner, v. JAMES R. McDONOUGH, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Apr 22, 2008

Citations

Case No.: 3:06cv389/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Apr. 22, 2008)

Citing Cases

Paige v. Dixon

Doc. 4 at 7; see also Paige v. Jones, Case No. 3:06-cv-389/MCR/EMT.That § 2254 petition was denied on April…

Lopez v. Miller

If the petitioner surpasses the § 2254(d) hurdle, the court may nonetheless grant habeas relief only if the…