From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pagones v. Maddox

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 2002
295 A.D.2d 489 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2000-11443

Argued May 21, 2002.

June 18, 2002.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for defamation, the defendants, Alton H. Maddox and Alfred C. Sharpton, separately appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Hickman, J.), dated October 27, 2000, which, inter alia, denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(2) and (3) to vacate two judgments of the same court, both dated September 3, 1998 (one against each defendant) in favor of the plaintiff and against them.

Alton H. Maddox, Jr. Brooklyn, N.Y. appellant pro se, and Michael A. Hardy, New York, N.Y., for appellant Alfred C. Sharpton (one brief filed).

Pagones Cross, P.C., Beacon, N.Y. (Anthony L. Pagones of counsel), for plaintiff-respondent (no brief filed).

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General, New York, N.Y. (Mark Gimpel and Charles F. Sanders of counsel), nonparty-respondent pro se.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., DAVID S. RITTER, LEO F. McGINITY, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

As a general rule, this court will not consider any issue raised on a subsequent appeal that was raised or could have been raised on an earlier appeal that was dismissed for failure to prosecute, although we have inherent discretion to consider such issues (see Bray v. Cox, 38 N.Y.2d 350). Here, we decline to exercise this discretion. The appellants previously appealed from judgments entered September 3, 1998, in favor of the plaintiff. Their appeals, however, were dismissed by order of this court dated July 3, 2000, for lack of prosecution. The dismissals bar the instant appeals, which raise issues which could have been raised on the prior appeals (see Rubeo v. Grange Mut. Ins. Co., 93 N.Y.2d 750; Bray v. Cox, supra).

PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, McGINITY and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pagones v. Maddox

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 2002
295 A.D.2d 489 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Pagones v. Maddox

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN A. PAGONES, plaintiff-respondent, v. ALTON H. MADDOX, JR., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 18, 2002

Citations

295 A.D.2d 489 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
744 N.Y.S.2d 859

Citing Cases

Midlantic Commercial Leasing Corp. v. Levin

As a general rule, we do not consider any issues raised on a subsequent appeal that were raised, or could…