Opinion
December 27, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the appellant's motion to vacate his default in opposing the plaintiff's motion for an order of preclusion unless he complied with certain discovery demands. The appellant did not offer a reasonable excuse for his default (see, Bodi v Orciouli, 195 A.D.2d 841; American Sigol Corp. v Zicherman, 166 A.D.2d 628; Mantilla v Lewkowitz, 130 A.D.2d 557). Mangano, P.J., Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.