From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pagnani v. Suffolk Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jul 19, 2017
152 A.D.3d 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

07-19-2017

In the Matter of Fay PAGNANI, petitioner, v. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, et al., respondents.

Black & Black, PLLC, Huntington, NY (Bronwyn M. Black and Edwin F. Black of counsel), for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, NY (Anisha S. Dasgupta, Valerie Figueredo, and Mark Shawhan of counsel), for respondent New York State Department of Health.


Black & Black, PLLC, Huntington, NY (Bronwyn M. Black and Edwin F. Black of counsel), for petitioner.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, NY (Anisha S. Dasgupta, Valerie Figueredo, and Mark Shawhan of counsel), for respondent New York State Department of Health.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the Department of Health of the State of New York dated May 18, 2015, which, after a fair hearing pursuant to Social Services Law § 22, upheld a determination of the Suffolk County Department of Social Services dated September 12, 2014, that the petitioner was ineligible for Medicaid benefits due to her failure to submit proper documentation.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

In reviewing a Medicaid eligibility determination made after a fair hearing, the court must review the record, as a whole, to determine if the agency's decisions are supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Bosco v. McGuire, 111 A.D.3d 931, 932, 975 N.Y.S.2d 687 ). "Substantial evidence means such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a conclusion or ultimate fact. The petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating eligibility" (Matter of Loiacono v. Demarzo, 72 A.D.3d 969, 969–970, 898 N.Y.S.2d 513 [internal quotation marks omitted] ).

Here, the determination of the Commissioner of the Department of Health of the State of New York that the petitioner did not establish good cause for her failure to provide in a timely manner documents necessary for the processing of her application for Medicaid benefits is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Bosco v. McGuire, 111 A.D.3d at 932, 975 N.Y.S.2d 687 ; Matter of Frohlinger v. DeBuono, 278 A.D.2d 323, 324, 718 N.Y.S.2d 208 ).

DILLON, J.P., HINDS–RADIX, LaSALLE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pagnani v. Suffolk Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jul 19, 2017
152 A.D.3d 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Pagnani v. Suffolk Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Fay Pagnani, petitioner, v. Suffolk County Department of…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Jul 19, 2017

Citations

152 A.D.3d 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
152 A.D.3d 696
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 5734

Citing Cases

Schaffer v. Zucker

The petitioner's contentions that Social Services was required to send Fountain copies of its communications…

Mangels v. Zucker

The proceeding also must be dismissed insofar as asserted against Samuel D. Roberts, as Commissioner of the…