From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Padilla v. Lever

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 20, 2006
446 F.3d 922 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

No. 03-56259.

April 20, 2006.

Thomas A. Saenz, Esq., Steven J. Reyes, Esq., Mexican American Legal Defense Educational Fund (MALDEF) Voting Rights Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Benjamin P. De Mayo, Esq., Wendy J. Phillips, Esq., Orange County Counsel's Office Hall of Administration, Santa Ana, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Michael Strumwasser, Esq., Strumwasser Woocher, Santa Monica, CA, for Defendant.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.


ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.


Summaries of

Padilla v. Lever

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 20, 2006
446 F.3d 922 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

Padilla v. Lever

Case Details

Full title:Sandra PADILLA; Victor Sanchez; Rosa Andrade, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 20, 2006

Citations

446 F.3d 922 (9th Cir. 2006)

Citing Cases

Heredia v. Santa Clara County

The parties do not dispute that subsection (b) applies to Santa Clara County. The present motion turns on the…