Opinion
10-CV-4891 (DLI) (RLM).
November 29, 2010
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
On November 19, 2010, the Pro Se Clerk's Office received and filed a Second Amended Complaint from pro se plaintiff Carmen Padilla. As plaintiff did not have leave of the Court or written consent of defendants to further amend her complaint, the operative pleading in this case is her Amended Complaint, filed on November 15, 2010, which the United States Marshal's Service was previously ordered to serve on defendants. See Order (Nov. 17, 2010).
Under certain circumstances, a party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(1); after a pleading has been amended, further amendments require "the opposing party's written consent or the court's leave." Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(2).
The only "amendment" that the Court could discern is the attachment of additional exhibits.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: Brooklyn, New York November 29, 2010