From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Padgett v. McCoy

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1914
83 S.E. 756 (N.C. 1914)

Opinion

(Filed 16 December, 1914.)

Mark W. Brown for plaintiff.

Garland A. Thomasson, Zebulon Weaver, and Wells Swain for defendant.


The motion for a new trial in this case, because of newly discovered evidence, is denied. The application is not within the rule applicable to such cases. Johnson v. R. R., 163 N.C. at page 453. Besides, it is without real merit.

Motion denied.


Summaries of

Padgett v. McCoy

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1914
83 S.E. 756 (N.C. 1914)
Case details for

Padgett v. McCoy

Case Details

Full title:JAMES H. PADGETT v. S. ANNIE McCOY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 1, 1914

Citations

83 S.E. 756 (N.C. 1914)
167 N.C. 508

Citing Cases

Alexander v. Cedar Works

We refer now to the second affidavit of Hector Austen, made in behalf of plaintiff." See Wheeler. v. Cole,…