From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paddock v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 24, 1939
128 S.W.2d 389 (Tex. Crim. App. 1939)

Opinion

No. 20403.

Delivered May 3, 1939. Rehearing Denied May 24, 1939.

1. — Record — Notice of Appeal.

An order entered by the trial court on its docket showing the giving of a notice of appeal from a conviction can be entered in the minutes of the trial court at a later term of the court nunc pro tunc.

2. — Record — Jurisdiction.

Where, on appeal from conviction, a supplemental transcript showing orders made by the trial court on its docket, was filed, but said record did not show that notice of appeal was entered in the minutes of trial court, appellate court was without jurisdiction to hear appeal.

Appeal from District Court of Hamilton County. Hon. R. B. Cross, Judge.

Appeal from conviction for burglary; penalty, confinement in penitentiary for two years.

Appeal dismissed.

The opinion states the case.

J. A. Johnson, of Stephenville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


Appellant was convicted of burglary, and assessed a penalty of two years in the penitentiary.

No notice of appeal appears to have been entered in the minutes of the trial court. Hence we have no jurisdiction. See Branch's P. C., Sec. 588, p. 302.

The appeal is dismissed.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.


This appeal was heretofore dismissed on account of a failure to have the notice of appeal passed into the minutes of the trial court. See Art. 827, C. C. P.

There is now filed herein a supplemental transcript showing the orders made by the trial court on its docket, but nowhere therein is it shown that the proper orders have been passed into the minutes of the court. That such order showing the giving of a notice of appeal could have been entered at a later term of the court nunc pro tunc is shown by Art. 827, C. C. P. Such, however, has not been done in this case. The supplemental transcript only contains a copy of the judge's notations on his trial docket, certified to by the district clerk. The record before us still remains in the condition that no notice of appeal is entered in the minutes, and we are therefore without jurisdiction to hear this appeal.

The motion to re-instate is therefore overruled.


Summaries of

Paddock v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 24, 1939
128 S.W.2d 389 (Tex. Crim. App. 1939)
Case details for

Paddock v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHARLIE PADDOCK v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: May 24, 1939

Citations

128 S.W.2d 389 (Tex. Crim. App. 1939)
128 S.W.2d 389