From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pacific Orient Co. v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of California
Jan 16, 1928
203 Cal. 797 (Cal. 1928)

Opinion

Docket No. S.F. 12825.

January 16, 1928.

APPLICATION for a Writ of Prohibition to restrain respondent from certain proceedings. Writ denied.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Joseph E. Bien and Werner Olds for Petitioner.

McCutchen, Olney, Mannon Greene for Respondents.


MEMORANDUM CASE.


THE COURT.

[1] Application for a writ of prohibition directing the respondent Superior Court to desist from further proceedings in an action brought to compel the petitioner here to submit a dispute or controversy to arbitration pursuant to the terms of the contract entered into before the present law on arbitration became effective. (Code Civ. Proc., secs. 1280 et seq., Stats. 1927, page 404.) The petition is denied on the authority of In the Matter of the Application of Berkovitz v. Arbib Houlberg, 230 N.Y. 261 [ 130 N.E. 288]; Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co., 264 U.S. 109 [68 L.Ed. 582, 44 Sup. Ct. Rep. 174]. (All concur.)

Rehearing denied.

All the Justices concurred.


Summaries of

Pacific Orient Co. v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of California
Jan 16, 1928
203 Cal. 797 (Cal. 1928)
Case details for

Pacific Orient Co. v. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:PACIFIC ORIENT COMPANY (a Corporation), Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jan 16, 1928

Citations

203 Cal. 797 (Cal. 1928)
262 P. 1117

Citing Cases

Clogston v. Schiff-Lang Co., Inc.

"Although prior to the year 1927, at which time the statutes of this state with reference to the subject of…