Pace v. Pace

Full title: BRADLEY T. PACE, Appellant, v. SHARESE M. PACE, Appellee.

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jan 8, 2021

308 So. 3d 1142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 5D20-723

01-08-2021

Bradley T. PACE, Appellant, v. Sharese M. PACE, Appellee.

Gary S. Israel, of Gary S. Israel, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant. No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Gary S. Israel, of Gary S. Israel, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. We reverse the order finding Bradley T. Pace in contempt for the reasons we explained in Pace v. Pace , 295 So. 3d 898 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020) ( Pace I ). The evidence presented at the hearing in this case is essentially identical to the evidence in Pace I . ¹

1 We observe that the trial court did not have the benefit of Pace I when rendering the instant order of contempt.
--------

REVERSED and REMANDED.

EVANDER, C.J., ORFINGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.