From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pace v. Lawrence

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Oct 14, 2020
CASE NO. 19-22928-CV-KING (S.D. Fla. Oct. 14, 2020)

Opinion

CASE NO. 19-22928-CV-KING

10-14-2020

MARVIN PACE, Plaintiff, v. A. LAWRENCE, et al., Defendants.

cc: Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid All counsel of record Marvin Pace, pro se


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon the September 25, 2020 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid (DE 22). Objections were due by October 9, 2020; none were filed.

After initial screening of the Complaint, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), Judge Reid recommends that the following claims PROCEED:

1. The excessive force claims against Defendant Lewis and Defendant Barnes;

2. The state law battery claims against Defendant Lewis and Defendant Barnes;

3. The failure-to-intervene claims against Defendants Martin, Kaesenthout, and Lieutenant M.P.;

4. Both deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims against Defendant Lewis;

5. The conditions-of-confinement claim under the Eighth Amendment against Defendant Lewis;

6. The due process claims against Defendants Lewis, Duke, and the Jane Doe Defendant. Additionally, Judge Reid recommends that the following claims be DISMISSED:

7. The ADA claim against Defendant Lewis;

8. The access-to-courts claim against Defendant Lewis;

9. The right to communicate claim against Defendant Lewis;

10. The failure to protect claim against all Defendants;

11. The "Fraud by False Documentation" claim;

12. The RLUIPA claim against Defendant Lewis;

13. The First Amendment Free Exercise Clause claim against Defendant Lewis; and

14. All other claims that were invoked and not fully developed against any other Defendant.

After a thorough review of the record, and consideration of the R&R, the Court concludes that the R&R is well-reasoned and accurately states the law of the case. Therefore, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Magistrate Judge Reid's Report and Recommendation (DE 22) be, and the same is, hereby AFFIRMED and ADOPTED as an order of this Court.

DONE and ORDERED in chambers at the James Lawrence King Federal Justice Building and United States Courthouse, Miami, Florida, this 14th day of October, 2020.

/s/_________

JAMES LAWRENCE KING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE cc: Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid

All counsel of record

Marvin Pace, pro se


Summaries of

Pace v. Lawrence

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Oct 14, 2020
CASE NO. 19-22928-CV-KING (S.D. Fla. Oct. 14, 2020)
Case details for

Pace v. Lawrence

Case Details

Full title:MARVIN PACE, Plaintiff, v. A. LAWRENCE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Date published: Oct 14, 2020

Citations

CASE NO. 19-22928-CV-KING (S.D. Fla. Oct. 14, 2020)

Citing Cases

Chapman v. Proctor

The vagueness of Plaintiff's claim is fatal to it. See Kerch v. Johnson, No. 5:17-CV-108, 2017 WL 8813080, at…

Brown v. Tony

Therefore, those unchanged allegations remain insufficient to set forth a claim under the First Amendment's…