From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oxley v. Jones

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 20, 2024
23-cv-00510 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-00510 BLF (PR)

06-20-2024

SAMUEL RUSS OXLEY, Plaintiff, v. DEPUTY SAMUEL JONES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING DISCOVERY MOTION AS UNNECESSARY (DOCKET NO. 63)

BETH LABSON FREEMAN, United States District Judge.

Plaintiff, who appears to be a pretrial detainee currently confined at the West County Detention Facility, filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against officers of the Contra Costa County Sheriff's Department. Dkt. No. 1. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on April 1, 2024. Dkt. No. 55. In the last court order, Plaintiff was granted an extension of time until June 24, 2024, to file an opposition. Dkt. No. 61.

Plaintiff has filed a motion for Defendants to produce discovery. Dkt. No. 63. As Plaintiff has previously been advised, such motions are unnecessary as he must correspond directly with Defendants regarding discovery requests rather than file motions with the Court. Dkt. No. 40. Accordingly, this recent motion is DENIED as unnecessary.

This order terminates Docket No. 63.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Oxley v. Jones

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 20, 2024
23-cv-00510 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2024)
Case details for

Oxley v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL RUSS OXLEY, Plaintiff, v. DEPUTY SAMUEL JONES, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jun 20, 2024

Citations

23-cv-00510 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2024)