holding defendant's failure to remove snow from near the sidewalk where it could melt and refreeze was not an "affirmative act" rendering defendant liable under the Kansas Tort Claims Act and noting that "[s]uch a requirement would appear to impose an undue burden on the property owner"
Summary of this case from Kaminski v. United StatesNo. 91,157.
June 11, 2004.
Appeal from the Wyandotte.
Unpublished Opinions Affirmed.
holding defendant's failure to remove snow from near the sidewalk where it could melt and refreeze was not an "affirmative act" rendering defendant liable under the Kansas Tort Claims Act and noting that "[s]uch a requirement would appear to impose an undue burden on the property owner"
Summary of this case from Kaminski v. United StatesIn Owoyemi, the plaintiff was injured when she slipped and fell on ice that had formed on a walkway between a parking garage and the main hospital entrance of the University of Kansas Medical Center.
Summary of this case from Lain v. Johnson Cnty. Cmty. Coll.Full title:Owoyemi v. University of Kansas
Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas
Date published: Jun 11, 2004
In its motion to dismiss, JCCC contends that it is immune from liability for plaintiff's injuries because…
Kaminski v. United StatesBut, in three of the cases defendant cites to support this argument, the land owners had no duty to remove…