From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Owens v. Rapoport

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 25, 2016
No. 2:16-cv-0273 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2016)

Opinion

No. 2:16-cv-0273 CKD P

04-25-2016

THEON OWENS, Plaintiff, v. ELENA RAPOPORT, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 3) is denied. Dated: April 25, 2016

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2/kly
owen0273.31


Summaries of

Owens v. Rapoport

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 25, 2016
No. 2:16-cv-0273 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2016)
Case details for

Owens v. Rapoport

Case Details

Full title:THEON OWENS, Plaintiff, v. ELENA RAPOPORT, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 25, 2016

Citations

No. 2:16-cv-0273 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2016)