From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Owens v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Jul 31, 2012
5:12CV00159 SWW/JTR (E.D. Ark. Jul. 31, 2012)

Opinion

5:12CV00159 SWW/JTR

07-31-2012

LANCE MITCHELL OWENS, ADC #610855, et al. PLAINTIFFS v. ARTIS RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff Owens' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (docket entry #9) is DENIED.

2. The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith.

Susan Webber Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Owens v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Jul 31, 2012
5:12CV00159 SWW/JTR (E.D. Ark. Jul. 31, 2012)
Case details for

Owens v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:LANCE MITCHELL OWENS, ADC #610855, et al. PLAINTIFFS v. ARTIS RAY HOBBS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Jul 31, 2012

Citations

5:12CV00159 SWW/JTR (E.D. Ark. Jul. 31, 2012)

Citing Cases

Schuh v. Burleigh Morton Det. Ctr.

This claim “must be pursued by filing a separate § 1983 action after he has fully and properly exhausted his…