From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Owens-Bey v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Aug 18, 1998
974 S.W.2d 653 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 73519.

OPINION FILED: August 18, 1998.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS CITY, HONORABLE BRENDAN RYAN, JUDGE.

Mark A. Grothoff, Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Meghan J. Stephens, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before James R. Dowd, P.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and Richard B. Teitelman, J.


ORDER


Tony Owens-Bey (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Owens-Bey v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Aug 18, 1998
974 S.W.2d 653 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Owens-Bey v. State

Case Details

Full title:TONY OWENS-BEY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO

Date published: Aug 18, 1998

Citations

974 S.W.2d 653 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)