Overton v. Clerk

Full title: MICHAEL LOUIS OVERTON, Plaintiff, v. JUDGE'S CLERK et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 4, 2015

2:15-cv-1253 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2015)

Opinion

MICHAEL LOUIS OVERTON, Plaintiff, v. JUDGE'S CLERK et al., Defendants. No. 2:15-cv-1253 DAD P United States District Court, E.D. California. August 4, 2015

          ORDER

          DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

         By order filed June 23, 2015, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result dismissal of this action without prejudice. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.¹

1 Plaintiff has consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (Doc. No. 7)