From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ourpet's Company v. Worldwise, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio
Sep 24, 2007
Case No 1:07v899 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 24, 2007)

Opinion

Case No 1:07v899.

September 24, 2007


ORDER


Upon representation of counsel that the matter has been settled between the parties, IT IS ORDERED that the docket be marked, "settled and dismissed with prejudice."

Any subsequent order setting forth different terms and conditions relative to the settlement and dismissal of the within action shall supersede the within order.

FURTHER, the Court retains continuing jurisdiction to resolve disputes concerning the memorialization of this settlement agreement. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375 (1994).


Summaries of

Ourpet's Company v. Worldwise, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio
Sep 24, 2007
Case No 1:07v899 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 24, 2007)
Case details for

Ourpet's Company v. Worldwise, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:OurPet's Company, Plaintiff(s), v. Worldwise, Inc. Defendant(s)

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio

Date published: Sep 24, 2007

Citations

Case No 1:07v899 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 24, 2007)