From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ouderkirk v. Wiggs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 6, 1942
265 App. Div. 905 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Opinion

November 6, 1942.

Present — Crosby, P.J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.


Judgment and order affirmed with costs. All concur, except Harris, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and facts and for granting a new trial, on the ground that the findings of freedom from negligence and the findings of contributory negligence are contrary to and against the weight of evidence, and on the further ground that there were errors in the exclusion of testimony. (The judgment is for defendant for no cause of action, in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.)


Summaries of

Ouderkirk v. Wiggs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 6, 1942
265 App. Div. 905 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)
Case details for

Ouderkirk v. Wiggs

Case Details

Full title:MARY OUDERKIRK, Appellant, v. IRVING WIGGS, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 6, 1942

Citations

265 App. Div. 905 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)