From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

OUCH v. WARDEN, LONDON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jun 3, 2009
CASE NO. 2:09-cv-00173 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 3, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:09-cv-00173.

June 3, 2009


OPINION AND ORDER


On April 1, 2009, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed. Although the parties were advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed.

The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

OUCH v. WARDEN, LONDON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jun 3, 2009
CASE NO. 2:09-cv-00173 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 3, 2009)
Case details for

OUCH v. WARDEN, LONDON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION

Case Details

Full title:CHAN OUCH, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, LONDON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Jun 3, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. 2:09-cv-00173 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 3, 2009)