From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Otto v. Hillsborough Cnty.

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 9, 2012
565 U.S. 1109 (2012)

Opinion

No. 11–7148.

01-09-2012

Martin W. OTTO, et ux., petitioners, v. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA.


Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner allowed until January 30, 2012, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.


Summaries of

Otto v. Hillsborough Cnty.

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 9, 2012
565 U.S. 1109 (2012)
Case details for

Otto v. Hillsborough Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:Martin W. OTTO, et ux., petitioners, v. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Jan 9, 2012

Citations

565 U.S. 1109 (2012)
132 S. Ct. 1074
181 L. Ed. 2d 731
80 U.S.L.W. 3395