From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ottis v. Magedson

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Mar 26, 2008
4:07CV3251 (D. Neb. Mar. 26, 2008)

Opinion

4:07CV3251.

March 26, 2008


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


On February 26, 2008, United States Magistrate Judge David L. Piester filed a memorandum and order noting that "[m]ore that 120 days have passed since this lawsuit was filed, yet the plaintiff has filed no proof of service as required under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(l), and there has been no entry of appearance or filing made on behalf of any named defendant." (See filing 6.) The magistrate judge ordered that "[t]he plaintiff is given until March 14, 2008, to show cause why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) or for want of prosecution." (Id.)

The deadline established by the magistrate judge has passed, and the plaintiff not shown good cause for his failure to serve the defendants in good time.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the plaintiff's claims against the defendants are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).


Summaries of

Ottis v. Magedson

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Mar 26, 2008
4:07CV3251 (D. Neb. Mar. 26, 2008)
Case details for

Ottis v. Magedson

Case Details

Full title:J. PAUL OTTIS, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD MAGEDSON, an individual, XCENTRIC…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Mar 26, 2008

Citations

4:07CV3251 (D. Neb. Mar. 26, 2008)