From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Otteson v. Baird

Supreme Court of Utah
Jun 15, 1964
392 P.2d 1017 (Utah 1964)

Opinion

No. 10018.

June 15, 1964.

Appeal from the Fifth District Court, Juab County, C. Nelson Day, J.

William H. Henderson, Salt Lake City, for appellant.

Udell R. Jensen, Nephi, for respondent.


This case involves about $550 claimed by a father and son for wages. Five prominent lawyers took part. There is no legal problem involved, but about 150 pages of record are. The question is who promised whom what. The trial court decided who promised whom. The case strictly is factual, unfortunately for lawyers who have to buy books and read our decisions. Though this writer may have decided otherwise, the trial court held for the plaintiff on controverted evidence. Under familiar rules anent appellate procedure we affirm, with costs to respondent.

McDONOUGH, CALLISTER, CROCKETT and WADE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Otteson v. Baird

Supreme Court of Utah
Jun 15, 1964
392 P.2d 1017 (Utah 1964)
Case details for

Otteson v. Baird

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND OTTESON, PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT, v. M.E. BAIRD ET AL.…

Court:Supreme Court of Utah

Date published: Jun 15, 1964

Citations

392 P.2d 1017 (Utah 1964)
15 Utah 2