From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Otter Prods., LLC v. Stage Two Nine, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 12, 2019
Civil Action No. 18-cv-01724-CMA-NYW (D. Colo. Feb. 12, 2019)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 18-cv-01724-CMA-NYW

02-12-2019

OTTER PRODUCTS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. STAGE TWO NINE, LLC, and JUSTIN L'HEUREUX, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING JANUARY 15, 2019 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on the January 15, 2019 Recommendation (Doc. # 26) by United States Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang that Defendants Stage Two Nine, LLC and Justin L'Heureux's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 12) should be granted in part and denied in part. The Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

The Recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were due within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation. (Doc. # 26 at 27.) Despite this advisement, no objections to Magistrate Judge Wang's Recommendation were filed by either party. "In the absence of timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate [judge's] report under any standard it deems appropriate." Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (stating that "[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings.")).

The Court has reviewed all relevant pleadings concerning the underlying claim and the Recommendation. Based on this review, the Court concludes that Magistrate Judge Wang's thorough and comprehensive analyses and recommendations are correct and that "there is no clear error on the face of the record." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 Advisory Committee's Note. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Wang as the findings and conclusions of this Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 26) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. It is

FURTHER ORDERED Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 12) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Specifically, the Motion is GRANTED as to claims Three and Four of Plaintiff's Complaint and the Motion is DENIED as to all other claims.

DATED: February 12, 2019

BY THE COURT:

/s/_________

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Otter Prods., LLC v. Stage Two Nine, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 12, 2019
Civil Action No. 18-cv-01724-CMA-NYW (D. Colo. Feb. 12, 2019)
Case details for

Otter Prods., LLC v. Stage Two Nine, LLC

Case Details

Full title:OTTER PRODUCTS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. STAGE TWO NINE, LLC, and JUSTIN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Feb 12, 2019

Citations

Civil Action No. 18-cv-01724-CMA-NYW (D. Colo. Feb. 12, 2019)