Opinion
May 8, 1940.
Present — Crosby, P.J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and McCurn, JJ.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in a negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.)
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Otis v. Starrett-Syracuse Corporation
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 8, 1940
259 App. Div. 970 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)
Summaries of
Otis v. Starrett-Syracuse Corporation
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 8, 1940
259 App. Div. 970 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)
Case details for
Otis v. Starrett-Syracuse Corporation
Case Details
Full title:GRACE OTIS, Respondent, v. STARRETT-SYRACUSE CORPORATION, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: May 8, 1940
Citations
259 App. Div. 970 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)
Citing Cases
Ordway v. Hilliard
The defendants owed the plaintiffs, their tenants, the duty of keeping said hallway in a reasonably safe…
Baker v. Seneca Hotel Corp.Upon this proof the jury could have found that the defendant had either actual or constructive notice of its…