From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ossad v. 125 East Broadway Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 1958
6 A.D.2d 827 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Summary

In Ossad v. 125 East Broadway Corp. (6 A.D.2d 827) the Appellate Division, Second Department, indicated that, where a previous motion to strike had been denied without prejudice to the independent determination of a defendant's right to examine, a subsequent vacating of the defendant's notice to examine was improper.

Summary of this case from La Porte v. Bertolino

Opinion

June 23, 1958


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from an order granting a motion to vacate a notice to examine respondent before trial. The notice was served nine months subsequent to joinder of issue, and after respondent had filed a statement of readiness (see Rules App. Div. [2d Dept.], special rule, eff. Jan. 15, 1957, as amd.). Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied; the examination to proceed on five days' notice. Within 20 days after the statement of readiness was filed, appellant moved, pursuant to subdivision (4) of the special rule, to strike the cause from the calendar. That motion was denied "without prejudice to the independent determination of [appellant's] right to examine [respondent]". The denial to appellant of the right to examine the respondent, under the circumstances here presented, was an improvident exercise of discretion. Nolan, P.J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ossad v. 125 East Broadway Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 1958
6 A.D.2d 827 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

In Ossad v. 125 East Broadway Corp. (6 A.D.2d 827) the Appellate Division, Second Department, indicated that, where a previous motion to strike had been denied without prejudice to the independent determination of a defendant's right to examine, a subsequent vacating of the defendant's notice to examine was improper.

Summary of this case from La Porte v. Bertolino
Case details for

Ossad v. 125 East Broadway Corporation

Case Details

Full title:DAVID OSSAD, Respondent, v. 125 EAST BROADWAY CORPORATION, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 23, 1958

Citations

6 A.D.2d 827 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Citing Cases

La Porte v. Bertolino

None of the cases cited by defendant supports his position. In Ossad v. 125 East Broadway Corp. ( 6 A.D.2d…