From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oseary v. AmGUARD Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 21, 2022
2:22-cv-01092-RGK-MRW (C.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01092-RGK-MRW

10-21-2022

JOANN ROTH OSEARY, Plaintiff, v. AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Defendant.


[FRCP, Rule 41(a)]

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE [26]

HON. R. GARY KLAUSNER, DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to the parties' Stipulation for Dismissal of Action with Prejudice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. This entire action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and
2. Each party shall bear her or its own attorney's fees and costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Oseary v. AmGUARD Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 21, 2022
2:22-cv-01092-RGK-MRW (C.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Oseary v. AmGUARD Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOANN ROTH OSEARY, Plaintiff, v. AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Oct 21, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01092-RGK-MRW (C.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2022)