Opinion
Case No. 2-11-cv-00154-GMN-NJK
03-19-2013
EDWARD OSCKEL, individually, and TONYA OSCKEL, individually, Plaintiffs. v. RANDY JAMES PARDEE, individually; NEW PRIME, INC., a foreign corporation, d/b/a PRIME INC.; DOES I through 20; and ROE CORPORATIONS 21 through 40, inclusive, Defendants.
JEROME R. BOWEN, ESQ. SARAH M. BANDA, ESQ. BOWEN LAW OFFICES Attorney for Plaintiffs BRUCE SCOTT DICKINSON, ESQ. MICHAEL HOTTMAN, ESQ. STEPHENSON & DICKINSON, P.C. Attorney for Defendant New Prime Inc. MICHAEL C. MILLS, ESQ. CARRIE MCCREA HANLON, ESQ. MILLS & ASSOCIATES Attorney for Defendant Randy James Pardee
JEROME R. BOWER ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 4540
SARAH M. BANDA, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 11909
BOWEN LAW OFFICES
9960 W. Cheyenne Ave., Suite 250
Las Vegas, Nevada 89129
Ph: 702-240-5191 Fax: 702-240-5797
twilcox@lvlawfirm.com
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
ORDER
AS AMENDED PAGE 2
JOINT REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER
COME NOW, Plaintiffs, EDWARD OSCKEL and TONYA OSCKEL, and Defendants, RANDY JAMES PARDEE, NEW PRIME, INC., a foreign corporation, d/b/a PRIME INC., by and through their respective counsel pursuant to LR 16, hereby submit the following Joint Request to Extend Deadline to File Joint Pretrial Order:
The Parties have a mediation scheduled for April 5, 2013 before Stewart Bell. The Parties are requesting an extension of time to file the Joint Pretrial Order through April 19, 2013 in order to facilitate the mediation in this matter. ____________________________
JEROME R. BOWEN, ESQ.
SARAH M. BANDA, ESQ.
BOWEN LAW OFFICES
Attorney for Plaintiffs
____________________________
BRUCE SCOTT DICKINSON, ESQ.
MICHAEL HOTTMAN, ESQ.
STEPHENSON & DICKINSON, P.C.
Attorney for Defendant New Prime Inc.
____________________________
MICHAEL C. MILLS, ESQ.
CARRIE MCCREA HANLON, ESQ.
MILLS & ASSOCIATES
Attorney for Defendant Randy James Pardee
Although the parties failed to comply with LR 26-4 by not filing the stipulation 21 days before the subject deadline, and by failing to show excusable neglect for the delayed filing, the Court nevertheless grants this stipulation in light of the potential for settlement.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE