From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Osborne v. Osborne

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
May 9, 1933
21 P.2d 1056 (Okla. 1933)

Opinion

No. 23472

Opinion Filed May 9, 1933.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Reversal — Failure of Defendant in Error to File Brief.

Where plaintiff in error has served and filed brief, but the defendant in error has neither filed a brief nor offered any excuse for his failure to do so, the court is not required to search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment of the trial court may be sustained, but may, where the authorities cited in the brief filed, appear reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, reverse the cause, with directions.

Appeal from Superior Court, Creek County; C.O. Beaver, Judge.

Action by O.F. Osborne against John Osborne. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded, with directions.

Walker Lewis, for plaintiff in error.

Johnson Jones, for defendant in error.


On the 14th day of August, 1931, judgment was rendered for the plaintiff in a partnership accounting contest, and the defendant appeals to this court and has filed a brief which reasonably supports the theory of the appeal.

The case is, therefore, reversed and remanded under the authority many times decided by this court and the rule as to filing brief, with directions to vacate the order and judgment of the court and dismiss the action.


Summaries of

Osborne v. Osborne

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
May 9, 1933
21 P.2d 1056 (Okla. 1933)
Case details for

Osborne v. Osborne

Case Details

Full title:OSBORNE v. OSBORNE

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: May 9, 1933

Citations

21 P.2d 1056 (Okla. 1933)
21 P.2d 1056

Citing Cases

World Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. Morgan

The plaintiff has filed no brief and offers no excuse for such failure. As stated in Osborne v. Osborne, 163…

Thigpen v. Antwine

Plaintiff has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, as stated…