From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Osborn v. LaGuardia

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 13, 1934
191 N.E. 519 (N.Y. 1934)

Opinion

Argued February 28, 1934

Decided March 13, 1934

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel ( Samuel Seabury, C. Dickerman Williams and William G. Mulligan, Jr., of counsel), for appellants.

Harold Riegelman, H.H. Nordlinger and Jacob M. Dinkes for respondents.



Order affirmed, with costs. First, second, fourth, fifth and sixth questions certified answered in the affirmative; seventh and eighth questions certified answered in the negative; and third question certified not answered. No opinion. (See 264 N.Y. 620.)

Concur: CRANE, LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS and CROUCH, JJ. Dissenting: POUND, Ch. J. Not sitting: KELLOGG, J.


Summaries of

Osborn v. LaGuardia

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 13, 1934
191 N.E. 519 (N.Y. 1934)
Case details for

Osborn v. LaGuardia

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM C. OSBORN et al., Respondents, v. FIORELLO H. LAGUARDIA, as Mayor…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 13, 1934

Citations

191 N.E. 519 (N.Y. 1934)
191 N.E. 519

Citing Cases

Wilmerding v. Laguardia

The worst that can happen to the plaintiff is that in subsequent years she may be obliged to pay higher real…

Smull v. Delaney

I ascribe the best of motives to the board in entering into the contracts involved and it was clearly…